Argumentation Quality Assessment
Theory vs. Practice
Abstract
Argumentation quality is viewed differently in argumentation theory and in practical assessment approaches. This paper studies to what extent the views match empirically. We find that most observations on quality phrased spontaneously are in fact adequately represented by theory. Even more, relative comparisons of arguments in practice correlate with absolute quality ratings based on theory. Our results clarify how the two views can learn from each other.
Details
- Externe Organisation(en)
-
Bauhaus-Universität Weimar
University of Toronto
Technische Universität Darmstadt
IBM Research Europe
- Typ
- Aufsatz in Konferenzband
- Seiten
- 250-255
- Anzahl der Seiten
- 6
- Publikationsdatum
- 07.2017
- Publikationsstatus
- Veröffentlicht
- Peer-reviewed
- Ja
- ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
- Sprache und Linguistik, Artificial intelligence, Software, Linguistik und Sprache
- Elektronische Version(en)
-
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P17-2039 (Zugang:
Offen
)
Zitieren
Laden...
