Publication Details

Argumentation Quality Assessment

Theory vs. Practice

authored by
Henning Wachsmuth, Nona Naderi, Ivan Habernal, Yufang Hou, Graeme Hirst, Iryna Gurevych, Benno Stein
Abstract

Argumentation quality is viewed differently in argumentation theory and in practical assessment approaches. This paper studies to what extent the views match empirically. We find that most observations on quality phrased spontaneously are in fact adequately represented by theory. Even more, relative comparisons of arguments in practice correlate with absolute quality ratings based on theory. Our results clarify how the two views can learn from each other.

External Organisation(s)
Bauhaus-Universität Weimar
University of Toronto
Technische Universität Darmstadt
IBM Research Europe
Type
Conference contribution
Pages
250-255
No. of pages
6
Publication date
07.2017
Publication status
Published
Peer reviewed
Yes
ASJC Scopus subject areas
Language and Linguistics, Artificial Intelligence, Software, Linguistics and Language
Electronic version(s)
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P17-2039 (Access: Open)